Assess Compression Results
Instructions to increase WAN-link capacity and examine
your gains due to compression
Packeteer's Xpress acceleration increases WAN-link throughput without
imposing cumbersome administrative overhead. It makes it seem as if your
WAN link offers more bandwidth than it really does.
For more background, see PacketGuide's
Compression Overview and the white paper titled "Accelerating
Throughput."
How much bandwidth savings are you getting from compression? Follow the
steps below to find out.
- Wait some time after enabling compression or changing compression's
settings to allow traffic to pass and the changes to have an effect.
- Display
the compression summary. Compare throughput rates with and without
compression, and examine the bytes saved due to compression.
If traffic is light or from applications that are not compressible (VoIP,
encrypted, and others), rates will not show a dramatic difference. Also,
overall savings for the entire link can look minimal due to much non-compressible
traffic. Class-based reports show more representative savings.
In addition, high-level or overall results can be misleading if some
traffic goes to locations with Xpress units at the destination (compression
is possible), and some traffic goes to destinations without Xpress units
(compression is not possible). The summary figures average all traffic,
compressed and not compressed, together.
- Create
the graph for Link
Compression Bytes Transferred. This graph provides a visual impression
of the difference compression has made. This one graph supplies a very
big picture. It shows traffic volume that you:
- Would have had without compression
- Actually did have with compression
- Saved due to compression
- Could not compress (VoIP, encrypted, and so on)
- Explore the variety of other
compression-related graphs for individual classes (especially
your critical and high-volume classes), partitions, and the link.
Note that compression results are most informative when you display
a graph or chart for one particular class, and the class has only one
particular type of traffic.
For example, suppose you have an Outbound traffic class for POP3 that
contains both standard and encrypted email. Examining compression results
for that POP3 class might not be very impressive. If your organization
had a sudden burst of secure email (encrypted traffic does not compress
well) then your overall compression figures for email would look rather
poor. But if you were to separate the POP3 class into two subordinate
classes, then you could run a compression report for the standard email
class and see some great results.
You might have a similar pattern with other classes that contain multiple
types of traffic.
If you need help or ideas in dividing your traffic tree into more granular
classes, see Create
an Application-Based Traffic Tree and Classification
Hints and Examples.
- Examine the output of the CLI
command compression
show.
It offers information about several aspects of compression status: whether
compression is enabled, the IP address and status of active tunnel partners,
details about the services that have active flows being compressed,
bytes saved due to recent compression, memory figures for amounts in
use and available, and other information.
The information can be helpful, but keep in mind that it shows status
for only the most recent few packets. So whether your byte savings look
stellar, dismal, or somewhere in-between, they are probably not representative
of your overall savings.
- If your compression seems not to be working well, see Compression
Troubleshooting. If you want to tune Xpress for better compression
results (an advanced project), see Accelerate
Traffic.
|